Fake evacuations
 

The Best Show in Town
by Uri Avnery
Gush Shalom, June 23, 2003
The most talented dior could not have done better. It was a perfect
show.
Television viewers all over the world saw heroic Israeli soldiers on their
screens battling the fanatical settlers. Close-ups: faces twisted with
passion, a soldier lying on a stretcher, a young woman crying in despair,
children weeping, youngsters storming forward in fury, masses of people
wrestling with each other. A battle of life and death.
There is no room for doubt: Ariel Sharon is leading a heroic fight against
the settlers in order to fulfil his promise to remove "unauthorized"
outposts, even "inhabited" ones. The old warrior is again facing a
determined enemy without flinching.
The conclusion is self-evident, both in Israel and throughout the world: if
such a tumultuous battle takes place for a tiny outpost inhabited by hardly
a dozen people, how can one expect Sharon to remove 90 outposts, as
promised in the Road Map? If things look like that when he has to remove a
handful of tents and one small stone building - how can one even dream of
evacuating real settlements, where dozens, hundreds or even thousands of
families are living?
This must have impressed George Bush and his people. Unfortunately, it has
not impressed me.
It makes me laugh.
In the last few years I have witnessed dozens of confrontation with the
army. I know what they really look like.
The Israeli army has already demolished thousands of Palestinian homes in
the occupied territories. This is how it goes: early in the morning,
hundreds of soldiers surround the land. Behind them come the tanks and
bulldozers, and the action starts. When despair drives the inhabitants to
resist, the soldiers hit them with sticks, throw tear gas grenades, shoot
rubber-coated metal bullets and, if the resistance is stronger, live
ammunition, too. Old people are thrown on the ground, women dragged along,
young people handcuffed and pushed against the wall. After a few minutes,
it's all over.
Well, they'll say, that's done to Arabs. They don't do this to Jews.
Wrong. They certainly do this to Jews. Depends who the Jews are.
I, for example, am a Jew. I have been attacked with tear gas five times so
far. Once it was a special gas, and for a few moments I was afraid that I
was going to choke to death.
During one of the blockades on Ramallah we decided to bring food to the
beleaguered town. We were some three thousand Israeli peace activists, both
Jews and Arabs. At the A-Ram checkpoint, north of Jerusalem, a line of
policemen and soldiers stopped us. There was an exchange of insults and a
lot of shouting. Suddenly we were showered with tear gas canisters. The
thousands dispersed in panic, coughing and choking, some were trampled; one
of our group, an 82-year old Jew and kibbutznik, was injured.
I have witnessed demonstrations in which rubber-coated bullets were shot at
Israeli citizens (generally Arabs). Once I was in the gas- filled rooms of
a school at Um-al-Fahem in Israel.
If the army had really wanted to evacuate Mitpe-Yitzhar quickly and
efficiently, it would have used tear gas. The whole business would have
been over in a few minutes. But then there would not have been dramatic
pictures on TV, and George W. would have asked his friend Arik: "Hey, why
don't you finish with all the outposts in a week?"
In other words, this was a well-produced show for TV.
A few days before, the leaders of the settlers met with Ariel Sharon. As
they left and faced the cameras they uttered dark threats, but anyone who
knows these people and looked at their faces on TV could see that there
were no strong emotions at work. Of course, the "Yesha rabbis" (Yesha is
settlerese for the West Bank), a group of bearded political functionaries,
called on the soldiers to disobey orders and requested the LORD and the
messiah to come to their help, but even they lacked real passion.
Why? Because all of them knew that everything has been agreed in advance.
The army chiefs and the leaders of the settlers, comrades and partners for
a long time, sat together and decided what would happen, and, more
importantly, what would not happen: no sudden attack, no efforts to prevent
thousands of young people from reaching the place well in advance, no use
of sticks, water cannon, tear gas, rubber-coated bullets or any other means
beyond the use of bare hands. The soldiers would not wear helmets nor be
equipped with shields. The settlers would shout and push, but would not hit
the soldiers in earnest. The whole show would be less violent then a normal
scuffle with British soccer hooligans, but would look on TV like a
desperate battle between titanic forces.
Ariel Sharon has some experience with this kind of thing. A dozen years ago
he died a similar show when, following the peace treaty with Egypt, he
was ordered by Prime Minister Menahem Begin to evacuate the town of Yamit
in the northern Sinai peninsula. At the time, Sharon was Minister if
Defense. And who was one of the leaders of the dramatic resistance? Tsachi
Hanegbi, now the minister in charge of the police.
All the arms of the establishment cooperated this week in the big show. The
media devoted many hours to the "battle". Dozens of settlers were invited
to the studios and talked endlessly - while, as far as I saw, not a single
person belonging to the active peace camp was called to the microphone.
The courts, too, did their duty: the handful of settlers that were arrested
for resisting violently were sent home after spending a day or two in jail.
The courts, who never show any mercy when Arabs appear before them, treated
the fanatical settlers like erring sons.
The whole comedy would have been funny, if it did not concern a very
serious problem. Such an "outpost" looks like a harmless cluster of mobile
homes on top of a god-forsaken hill, but it is far from being innocuous. It
is a symptom of a cancerous growth. Not for nothing did Ariel Sharon - the
very same Sharon - call upon the settlers a few years ago to take control
of all the hills of "Judea and Samaria".
The disease develops like this: a group of rowdies occupies a hilltop, some
miles from an established settlement, and puts a mobile home there. After
some time, the "outpost" already consists of a number of mobile homes. A
generator and a water-tower are brought in. Women with babies appear on the
scene. A fence is set up. The army sends some units to defend them. They
declare that for security reasons, Palestinians are not allowed to come
near, in order to prevent them from spying and preparing an attack. The
security zone becomes bigger and bigger. The inhabitants of the neighboring
Palestinian villages cannot reach some of their orchards and fields any
more. It someone tries, he is liable to be shot. Every settler has a
weapon, and he has nothing to fear from the law if he uses it against a
suspicious Arab. All Arabs are suspicious, of course.
As it so happens, I have some experience with Mitzpe Yitzhak, the
particular outpost that figured in this week's show. Some months ago we
were called by the inhabitants of the Palestinian village Habala to help
them pick their olives in a grove near this "outpost". When the pickers
came near to the outpost, the settlers opened fire. An Israeli in our group
was wounded when a bullet struck a rock at his feet.
The "unauthorized" outposts were in fact established systematically, with
the help of the army and according to its planning. When several outposts
take root in a region, the Palestinian villages are choked between them.
Their life becomes hell. The settlers and officers clearly hope that in the
end they will give up and clear out.
Will Sharon really evacuate them by the dozens? That depends, of course, on
his friend George W. If the "hudna" (truce) between the Palestinian
Authority and Hamas is achieved, Bush may perhaps exert serious pressure on
Sharon. When I visited Yasser Arafat yesterday, he seemed to be cautiously
optimistic. But he, too, said that there are no more than four months left
for getting things moving: starting from November, the American President
will be busy getting himself reelected.
This means that Sharon has only to produce a few more shows of this sort
for television, and then he and the settlers will be able to breathe freely
once again.
[] Same provocation - same purpose. Press release - June 22, 2003
[The following is the translation of a press release sent out by Gush
Shalom to the Hebrew media.]
Hebron: same provocation - same purpose
"The governmental and military decision makers do not even bother to
conceal or at least vary their acts. Again and again they get back to the
same provocation and with the same purpose. Each time that the negotiations
between the Palestinian factions seem to get somewhere close to a positive
conclusion - and the possibility of achieving a cease- fire which would end
the suicide bombings becomes a concrete option - they are in a hurry to
carry out another "liquidation". Thus, the government is offering to Hamas
on a silver platter a pretext to refuse the requests of Mahmoud Abbas (Abu
Mazen).
As the majority of the public already understands, such actions are not
intended to prevent the terrorist attacks. This government is interested in
them; they serve its policies.
 

  • Outdoor IP camera advice needed, thanks in advance
  • Wi-Fi For Home Security
  • Security camera management software
  • Trouble identifying security camera type
  • Beginner seeks advice on home video security
  • Which webcam for home security?
  • viewing streaming video from company
  • Source: Remington security camera
  • Surveillance Cameras Reduce Private Space
  • Help with General IP
  • CCTV and camera options? Please Help
  • Security Camera Articles